ARCHIVE ONLINE
CASE FILE #119

Daniel Prude

Victim

Daniel Prude

No verified photo on file

2020 · Age 41 · Rochester, NY

Last Known Information

Daniel Prude, 41, a father of five visiting Rochester, New York from Chicago, died on March 30, 2020, a week after Rochester police officers restrained him naked on a snow-covered street during a mental health crisis. Body-camera video, not made public until September 2020, showed officers placing a mesh “spit hood” over his head and pressing his face into the pavement for roughly two minutes until he stopped breathing. The Monroe County medical examiner ruled his death a homicide from “complications of asphyxia in the setting of physical restraint.” New York Attorney General Letitia James's office presented the case to a grand jury, which voted 15–5 in February 2021 not to indict any of the three officers involved. No one has ever been charged in Prude's death.

Location

Rochester, NY · Monroe County County

Discovery / Timeline
  • 2020: Case opens — victim reported missing or found.
  • Documented milestones (renewed investigation, media coverage, family advocacy) to be added as sourced.
  • Present: case remains unresolved. No named suspect has been convicted.
Investigation
  • The restraint, the spit hood, and Prude's death a week later, per body-camera video released by the family's attorneys in September 2020 and the Monroe County Medical Examiner's autopsy report.
  • The medical examiner ruled the death a homicide, citing asphyxia from physical restraint, with PCP listed as a contributing factor.
  • New York Attorney General Letitia James's office, required by state law to investigate police-involved deaths of unarmed civilians, presented a criminally negligent homicide charge to a grand jury.
  • The grand jury voted 15–5 not to indict any of the three officers, according to grand jury transcripts later released; five jurors indicated they would have voted to indict at least one officer.
  • Rochester's police chief was fired and seven officers were suspended in the aftermath of the video's public release, before the grand jury's decision.
  • The City of Rochester agreed to a $12 million settlement with Prude's estate for his five children in 2020.
What Remains Unknown
  • Whether the specific restraint technique used — which a 2015 department training bulletin itself warned could cause fatal positional asphyxia — was applied in a manner consistent with that training was presented to the grand jury but not resolved by any indictment.
  • The full grand jury proceedings remain sealed by law beyond the vote count and portions of transcripts later released; the specific legal theory prosecutors argued for and against indictment on each officer individually is not fully public.
  • Internal emails later showed Rochester police commanders urged withholding the video's public release, citing fears of unrest; the full extent of who in city government was aware of this recommendation, and when, has not been comprehensively detailed.
Sources
  • New York Attorney General — official statement on the grand jury decision
  • CNN — “Grand jury votes not to indict police officers in Rochester death of Daniel Prude”
  • CBS News — “Daniel Prude's estate settles with city of Rochester for $12 million”
  • Project Cold Case
  • Murder Accountability Project
  • NamUs
Unanswered Questions
Why did five of twenty grand jurors favor indicting at least one officer while the majority did not, given a 2015 department training bulletin warning explicitly about the restraint position's asphyxiation risk?
What specific role did the delayed public release of the body-camera footage — nearly six months after Prude's death — play in the investigation and prosecution timeline?
What accountability, if any, did Rochester city officials face for the internal recommendation to delay releasing the video?
More Cases From NY

Continue Your Research

Reading is the first step. Everything below is private to your own browser — nothing here is sent anywhere.

← Return to Case Board